Book Review: The Three Musketeers (Trilogie des Mousquetaires #1) by Alexandre Dumas
Ah, The Three Musketeers. A title that rings through the ages—a classic that many regard as a quintessential adventure tale. After adoring The Count of Monte Cristo, I was eager to dive headfirst into Dumas’s world again. Little did I know that my enthusiasm would soon turn into a whirlwind of disappointment and critique.
Set in the year 1625, the story introduces us to D’Artagnan, a fiery young nobleman from Gascony. His dreams of becoming a musketeer lead him to Paris, where he swiftly falls in with the infamous trio: Athos, Porthos, and Aramis. At its surface, the premise feels exhilarating—espionage, intrigue, and the fabled loyalty among friends. However, my experience sharply diverged from the swashbuckling cheer typically associated with these musketeers.
From the outset, I found myself struggling to connect with the protagonists. Our supposed heroes—D’Artagnan, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis—behaved with chilling cruelty. Their escapades more often resembled petty crime than valorous acts. Stealing, swindling, arguing, and seducing those beneath them in the social hierarchy, their actions often left a bitter taste. This was jarring, to say the least, especially after living through the deeply relatable journey of Edmond Dantès in The Count of Monte Cristo.
And then, there’s the harrowing episode involving Milady de Winter, the book’s most fascinating character. Here lies Dumas’s iron grip on feminist themes, with Milady portrayed as an early iteration of the femme fatale. Irresistible, cunning, and infinitely resourceful, she was the only character who made the book somewhat redeemable. Her mastery of deception and revenge—not just against D’Artagnan and his cohorts but against a society that demonized her—captured my interest far more than the initial quartet of musketeers.
Dumas’s writing style shines through with vivid imagery and vibrant dialogue, although I found the pacing uneven. Some sections sprinted ahead, while others plodded along. Despite these inconsistencies, certain moments sparkled. For instance, Milady’s infamous poison ring and her brilliant escape from imprisonment resonated deeply with me—subverting expectations of womanhood while emphasizing her agency. These scenes lingered in my mind long after I closed the book.
That being said, the darker themes are undeniably problematic. The shocking betrayal of D’Artagnan towards Milady is particularly disheartening, and it deeply seasoned my reading experience. Where was the narrative justice for her character? In contrast to Edmond, who ultimately finds redemption, Milady’s fate seemed tragically predetermined by society’s prejudices.
In conclusion, although The Three Musketeers offers swashbuckling moments and clever plot twists, it ultimately subverted my expectations. Potential readers looking for a spirited adventure might be misled, as Dumas delivers a narrative that revolves around deeply flawed characters. This book serves as a reminder that sometimes, the story isn’t just about who wears the crown of heroism but rather about the complexities within each character. If you’re someone who delights in discussions about morality, gender dynamics, and character arcs, this book will provoke much thought—even if it doesn’t satiate the appetite for a heroic tale. For me, the impact lingered long after I turned the last page, forcing me to rethink the very definition of heroism.
Discover more about The Three Musketeers (Trilogie des Mousquetaires #1) on GoodReads >>